INHERITANCE TAX, PART 1
　　RELATED LINKS
　　PDF version
　　In the Paper F6 （UK） exam, there will always be a minimum of five marks on inheritance tax. This two-part article will look at those aspects of inheritance tax that you need to know, with this first article explaining the scope of inheritance tax
　　The Paper F6 （UK） syllabus requires a basic understanding of inheritance tax （IHT）， and this two-part article covers those aspects that you need to know. It is relevant to candidates taking Paper F6 （UK） in either June or December 2013, and is based on tax legislation as it applies to the tax year 201213 （Finance Act 2012）。
　　There will always be a minimum of five marks （but no more than 15 marks） on IHT, with these marks being included in either Questions 3, 4 or 5.
　　The scope of inheritance tax IHT is paid on the value of a personˇs estate when they die, but it also applies to certain lifetime transfers of assets. If IHT did not apply to lifetime transfers it would be very easy for a person to avoid tax by giving away all of their assets just before they died.
　　As far as Paper F6 （UK） is concerned the terms ˉtransferˇ and ˉgiftˇ can be taken to mean the same thing. The person making a transfer is known as the donor, while the person receiving the transfer is known as the donee.
　　Unlike capital gains tax where, for example, a principal private residence is exempt, all of a personˇs estate is generally chargeable to IHT.
　　A person who is domiciled in the UK is liable to IHT in respect of their worldwide assets. As far as Paper F6 （UK） is concerned, people will always be domiciled in the UK.
　　Transfers of value During a personˇs lifetime IHT can only arise if a transfer of value is made. A transfer of value is defined as ˉany gratuitous disposition made by a person that results in a diminution in value of that personˇs estateˇ。 There are two important terms in this definition:
　　Gratuitous: Poor business deals, for example, are not normally transfers of value because there is no gratuitous intent.
　　Diminution in value: Normally there will be no difference between the diminution in value of the donorˇs estate and the increase in value of the doneeˇs estate. However, in some cases it may be necessary to compare the value of the donorˇs estate before the transfer, and the value after the transfer in order to compute the diminution in value. This will usually be the case where unquoted shares are concerned. Shares forming part of a controlling shareholding will be valued higher than shares forming part of a minority shareholding.
　　Example 1 On 4 May 2012 Daniel made a gift to his son of 15,000 1 ordinary shares in ABC Ltd, an unquoted investment company. Before the transfer Daniel owned 60,000 shares out of ABC Ltdˇs issued share capital of 100,000 1 ordinary shares. ABC Ltdˇs shares are worth 8 each for a holding of 15%, 10 each for a holding of 45%, and 18 each for a holding of 60%.
　　Although Danielˇs son received a 15% shareholding valued at 120,000 （15,000 x 8）， Danielˇs transfer of value is calculated as follows:
　?、G Value of shares held before the transfer 60,000 x 18 1,080,000
　　Value of shares held after the transfer 45,000 x 10
　　450,000 ________
　　Value transferred
　　630,000 ________
　　By contrast, for capital gains tax purposes the valuation will be based on the market value of the shares gifted, which is 120,000.
　　As far as Paper F6 （UK） is concerned, a transfer of value will always be a gift of assets. A gift made during a personˇs lifetime may be either potentially exempt or chargeable.
　　Potentially exempt transfers Any transfer that is made to another individual is a potentially exempt transfer （PET）。 A PET only becomes chargeable if the donor dies within seven years of making the gift. If the donor survives for seven years then the PET becomes exempt and can be completely ignored. Hence, such a transfer has the potential to be exempt.
　　If the donor dies within seven years of making a PET then it becomes chargeable. Tax will be charged according to the rates and allowances applicable to the tax year in which the donor dies. However, the value of a PET is fixed at the time that the gift is made.
　　Example 2 Sophie died on 23 January 2013. She had made the following lifetime gifts:
　　8 November 2005  A gift of 450,000 to her son.
　　12 August 2010  A gift of a house valued at 610,000 to her daughter. By 23 January 2013 the value of the house had increased to 655,000.
　　The gift to Sophieˇs son on 8 November 2005 is a PET for 450,000. As it was made more than seven years before the date of Sophieˇs death it is exempt from IHT.
　　The gift to Sophieˇs daughter on 12 August 2010 is a PET for 610,000 and is initially ignored. It becomes chargeable as a result of Sophie dying within seven years of making the gift, and the transfer of 610,000 will be charged to IHT based on the rates and allowances for 201213.
　　Chargeable lifetime transfers Any transfer that is made to a trust is a chargeable lifetime transfer （CLT）。
　　There is no legal definition of what a trust is, but essentially a trust arises where a person transfers assets to people （the trustees） to hold for the benefit of other people （the beneficiaries）。 For example, parents may not want to make an outright gift of assets to their young children. Instead, assets can be put into a trust with the trust being controlled by trustees until the children are older.
　　Unlike a PET, a CLT is immediately charged to IHT based on the rates and allowances applicable to the tax year in which the CLT is made. An additional tax liability may then arise if the donor dies within seven years of making the gift. Just as for a PET, the value of a CLT is fixed at the time that the gift is made, but the additional tax liability is calculated using the rates and allowances applicable to the tax year in which the donor dies.
　　Example 3 Lim died on 4 December 2012. She had made the following lifetime gifts:
　　2 November 2005  A gift of 420,000 to a trust.
　　21 August 2010  A gift of a house valued at 615,000 to a trust. By 4 December 2012 the value of the house had increased to 650,000.
　　The gift to the trust on 2 November 2005 is a CLT for 420,000, and will be immediately charged to IHT based on the rates and allowances for 200506. There will be no additional tax liability as the gift was made more than seven years before the date of Limˇs death.
　　The gift to the trust on 21 August 2010 is a CLT for 615,000, and will be immediately charged to IHT based on the rates and allowances for 201011. Lim has died within seven years of making the gift so an additional tax liability may arise based on the rates and allowances for 201213.
　　Rates of tax IHT is payable once a personˇs cumulative chargeable transfers over a seven-year period exceed a nil rate band. For the tax year 201213 the nil rate band is 325,000, and for previous years it has been as follows:
　?、G
　?、G 200304 255,000
　　200405
　　263,000 200506 275,000
　　200607
　　285,000 200708 300,000
　　200809
　　312,000 200910 325,000
　　201011
　　325,000 201112 325,000
　　The rate of IHT payable as a result of a personˇs death is 40%. This is the rate that is charged on a personˇs estate at death, on PETs that become chargeable as a result of death within seven years, and is also the rate used to see if any additional tax is payable on CLTs made within seven years of death.
　　The rate of IHT payable on CLTs at the time they are made is 20% （half the death rate）。 This is the lifetime rate.
　　The tax rates information that will be given in the tax rates and allowances section of the June and December 2013 exam papers is as follows: 1  325,000 Nil
　　Excess  Death rate  Lifetime rate
　　40% 20%
　　Where nil rate bands are required for previous years then these will be given to you within the question.
　　Example 4 Sophie died on 26 May 2012 leaving an estate valued at 600,000.
　　The IHT liability is as follows:
　　Death estate
　　 Chargeable estate 600,000
　　_______ IHT liability 325,000 at nil% 275,000 at 40% 100,000
　　_______
　　Example 5 Ming died on 22 April 2012 leaving an estate valued at 300,000.
　　On 30 April 2010 she had made a gift of 240,000 to her son. This figure is after deducting available exemptions.
　　IHT liabilities are as follows:
　　Lifetime transfer  30 April 2010
　?、G Potentially exempt transfer 240,000
　　_______
　　The PET is initially ignored.
　　Additional liability arising on death  30 April 2010
　　 Potentially exempt transfer 240,000
　　_______
　　The PET utilises 240,000 of the nil rate band of 325,000 for 201213. No IHT is payable.
　　Death estate
　?、G
　?、G Chargeable estate 300,000
　　_______ IHT liability 85,000 at nil% 215,000 at 40% 86,000
　　_______
　　Only 85,000 （325,000  240,000） of the nil rate band is available against the death estate.
　　Example 6 Joe died on 13 October 2012 leaving an estate valued at 750,000.
　　On 12 November 2009 he had made a gift of 400,000 to a trust. This figure is after deducting available exemptions. The trust paid the IHT arising from the gift.
　　The nil rate band for the tax year 200910 is 325,000.
　　Lifetime transfer  12 November 2009
　　 Chargeable estate 400,000
　　_______ IHT liability 325,000 at nil% 75,000 at 20% 15,000
　　_______
　　The gift to a trust is a CLT. The lifetime IHT liability is calculated using the nil rate band for 200910.
　　Additional liability arising on death  12 November 2009
　?、G Chargeable estate 400,000
　　_______ IHT liability 325,000 at nil% 75,000 at 40% 30,000
　　IHT already paid
　?。?5,000） _______
　　Additional liability
　　15,000
　　The additional liability arising on death is calculated using the nil rate band for 201213.
　　Death estate
　?、G Chargeable estate 750,000
　　_______ IHT liability 750,000 at 40% 300,000
　　_______
　　The CLT made on 12 November 2008 has fully utilised the nil rate band of 325,000.
　　Taper relief It would be somewhat unfair if a donor did not quite live for seven years after making a gift with the result that the gift was fully chargeable to IHT. Therefore taper relief reduces the amount of tax payable where a donor lives for more than three years, but less than seven years, after making a gift. The reduction is as follows: Years before death
　　Percentage reduction %
　　Years before death
　　Percentage reduction % Over three years but less than four years 20
　　Over four years but less than five years
　　40 Over five years but less than six years 60
　　Over six years but less than seven years
　　80
　　Although taper relief reduces the amount of tax payable, it does not reduce the value of a gift for cumulation purposes.
　　The taper relief table will be given in the tax rates and allowances section of the exam.
　　Example 7 Winnie died on 9 January 2013. She had made the following lifetime gifts:
　　2 November 2007  A gift of 460,000 to a trust. The trust paid the IHT arising from this gift
　　16 August 2009  A gift of 320,000 to her son
　　These figures are after deducting available exemptions.
　　The nil rate band for the tax year 200708 is 300,000, and for the tax year 200910 it is 325,000.
　　IHT liabilities are as follows: Lifetime transfers
　　通過ACCA考試實屬不易，首先要有執(zhí)著的精神，其次是不斷勤奮的學習，高頓網(wǎng)校為大家提供ACCA題庫免費做題，希望助大家一臂之力，查看詳情》
ACCA網(wǎng)絡課程課程專業(yè)名稱講師試聽
85%的人正在學習該課程ACCA 全維度網(wǎng)課體驗課程
實景課堂與獨立錄制
覆蓋所有知識點，根據(jù)學習計劃推進學習進度
高頓名師
70%的人正在學習該課程ACCA網(wǎng)課全科卡（8.2折）
為零基礎剛開始學習ACCA的學員特別定制		高頓名師